My
classes so far have exposed me to the many variables that exist in the field of
cultural heritage management in two different worlds, from African and European
perspectives. Apart from the classes I took, I have been receiving plenty of
insightful advice from professors and colleagues who shared experiences from
their home countries and their varied line of work. As a rule of thumb, I shall approach my
thesis taking into consideration all these various inputs which I received from
different individuals and sources I have encountered so far.
I
had a meeting with two of our professors, Joska and Alice, for my thesis
planning. During the meeting, it dawned upon me that despite my research topic
appearing to be a well thought proposition, it was still far from being
practically achievable considering the limited time frame I have here in
Budapest. It was suggested that I use the limited approach thus confining the
research to a practically achievable sample that represents the Zimbabwean
culture I want to focus on.
One
site which quickly crossed my mind was Chibvumani National Monument in
Bikita which was extensively excavated by Caton-Thompson, a British
archaeologist in 1929. Caton Thompson
concluded that Chibvumani National Monument was constructed by the Karanga people
probably soon after the abandonment of Great Zimbabwe in the 15th
century. Chibvumani was selected for a pilot project of National Museums and
Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ) dubbed ‘Adopt a site Programme' The programme
entailed involvement of local communities in the management of sites. The site was handed over to a local
School for conservation and visitor management in the event that it received
any. Consequently, the local community felt that this jeopardised the spiritual
values of the site. This was so because of the fact local community perceived
the school authorities as aliens to their heritage and hence cannot be assigned
such a responsibility.
I chose Ndongo an archaeological site built with sand
stone unlike most of the Dzimbahwe type sites such as Great Zimbabwe
and Khami
which were built with granite blocks. It is located to the East of Great
Zimbabwe approximately one hundred and forty four kilometres Middle Save basin
in Chiredzi District. What puzzles me is the fact that Ndongo is not listed as
a cultural heritage site by NMMZ. This is in spite of the fact that local
community once invited NMMZ for a
restoration from funding they got from United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) at Ndongo
site and in 2008 some excavations were conducted which yielded substantial
archaeological material.
Thus
far, I have selected sites that are managed by two different approaches. Ndongo
site has been thriving under community driven heritage management initiative
contrary to the adopt a site programme that has been used at Chibvumani
National Monument led by NMMZ. These differences in management of heritage
driven by lack of laid down policies on managing smaller heritage sites is what
my thesis is going to address by crafting a management policy for such. Nevertheless,
I will continue looking for some case studies of varied circumstances to
further explore heritage management in Zimbabwe in regards to this aspect.
I
will continue with my search for more sites to incorporate into my thesis.
Picture credits
picture 1: http://www.yourthoughtpartner.com/blog/think-of-your-strategy-as-a-journey
picture 2: https://southernafrican.news/2016/07/01/zims-architectural-mastery-dazzling/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't forget to sign your comments!