Just a few days ago I began
writing for this post, lead by exasperation and a sense of futility. The
following was my opening statement: “It has been a month and a half since
university started and I am no closer to narrowing down my thesis topic. If anything,
it has become more vague.”
The major uncertainty
holding me back was finding the right terminologies to describe my areas of
interest within heritage work. Without the right terminology I did not know
what to search for, what types of articles to read, what sort of initiatives to
investigate – in fact I wasn’t even sure if the things that interested me were
a valid part, an existing facet of heritage related work.
And then, I attended a
conference organized in the Petőfi Irodalmi Múzeum (Petőfi Literary Museum) by the Pulszky Society -
Hungarian Museum Association. The subject was Managing Collections in
Participatory Museums. I sat there, listening to experts of the field talk
about their own projects and the management goals of their institutions. I was
bombarded with terminology previously unfamiliar to me, linked to both
theoretical and practical explanations – and I found myself right smack in the
middle of my research interests. In my head things started to take shape.
The terminologies the conference used were all
in Hungarian, and I am not yet sure of their English equivalents (I’m working
on it though!). However, the most interesting presentations of the conference,
for me, were the ones that focused not only on what communities can do for the
safeguarding and transmission of heritage, but what heritage can do for the
communities.
Bearing this in mind I
returned to an earlier effort sense-making effort of mine. In order to get
closer to a well-defined area of interest I had decided to do what I have done
before, as a part of my thesis planning process: write a list of sorts, map out
my various interests and look for common denominators.
After the conference I took
out this page and organized my thoughts. While not the only such page in my
many notebooks, it includes several of the key aspects I would like to build my
thesis around, and some ideas, which I think, might help narrow down my subject
even further in the future. Looking at this page and breaking down each entry
into its core component, I learn the following about my interests:
I wish to investigate issues of
heritage related work meant to foster social goals.
Breaking this sentence down
even further I see thee main questions I will have to answer in order to
specify and narrow down my topic: What type of issues am I
interested in? What specifically do I mean by heritage related work?
What social goals do I wish to focus on?
What I can say about these
questions now are still generic, but are already taking me one step closer to
identifying my main areas of interest. Here are some of the general guidelines
I’m identifying for myself:
-
My
goal is not to look at communities brought together by a shared passion
for a heritage element (e.g. a folk-dancing group), but rather – and this
is what the word ‘related’ is trying to hint at – to look at
how heritage or places of memory can be used or even reused, repurposed,
reinterpreted, so help work towards social aims.
-
Social
aims can
include community building, integration, tackling mental health issues,
among countless others.
- - One of the core problems I keep
returning to is the longevity and the sustainability of such socially
engaged heritage related work, and therefore this might be the (or one of)
the core issues I would like to focus on
My next steps are clear:
write a list of all the Hungarian terms, phrases and approaches I have
encountered at the conference. Then I must research resources on them in
Hungarian, while simultaneously learning their English equivalents and
researching for resources on those as well. In the translation process I have
already asked for assistance from one of my professors and to get me started on
the Hungarian literature I have asked two of the three presenters from the
conference for their presentation slides as well as their contacts. They both
seemed happy to help and I will be contacting them soon. I also think that the
institutions they work for might serve as a terrific place for me to do an
internship in.
At the same time I will be
collecting institutions and organizations that carry out work I am interested
in, which relate to this topic. One such non profit organization has already
caught my attention, that of the Mind Sapce, and specifically their work within
the EU funded NewPilgimAge project - though I am only now beginning to investigate
their work.
I am confident that once I
find my footing in this field I have not yet worked with, I will start finding
the directions that interest me the most and will be able to identify where
there is room for another thesis. This will also allow me to develop a research
methodology and help me identify my main sources – besides literature review.
Simultaneously, the outcome of my project will depend on my answers to the
three questions listed above, though I suspect that there will be several
outcomes, and I hope that I will have the opportunity to put what I have learnt
into practice through involvement in an existing project or through the
creation of my own.
I see countless directions
in which my work might go, but for now, I am happy that I have found my
direction, however unspecific, and that I have found a few people to whom I can
reach out to. I feel less alone in my process and am once gain excited to move
forward.
To learn more about the
Collection Management Conference click here.
To learn more about the work of Mind Space
click here.
To learn more about the
NewPilgrimAge program click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't forget to sign your comments!